TY - JOUR
T1 - Acceleration of the numerical solution for the radiative transfer equation using a modified relaxation factor
T2 - X-factor method
AU - Torres-Aguilar, Carlos Enrique
AU - Xamán, Jesús
AU - Moreno-Bernal, Pedro
AU - Hernández-Pérez, Iván
AU - Zavala-Guillén, Ivett
AU - Hernández-López, Irving Osiris
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2020/5/11
Y1 - 2020/5/11
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to propose a novel relaxation modified factor to accelerate the numerical solution of the radiative transfer equation (RTE) with several high-resolution total variation diminishing schemes. The methodology proposed is denoted as the X-factor method. Design/methodology/approach: The X-factor method was compared with the technique deferred-correction (DC) for the calculations of a two-dimensional cavity with absorting-emiting-scatteting gray media using the discrete ordinates method. Four parameters were considered to evaluate: the absorption coefficient, the emissivity of boundary surface, the scattering albedo and under-relaxation factor. Findings: The results showed the central processing unit (CPU) time of X-factor method was lower than DC. The reductions of CPU time with the X-factor method were observed from 0.6 to 75.4%. Originality/value: The superiority of the X-factor method over DC was showed with the reduction of CPU time of the numerical solution of RTE for evaluated cases.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to propose a novel relaxation modified factor to accelerate the numerical solution of the radiative transfer equation (RTE) with several high-resolution total variation diminishing schemes. The methodology proposed is denoted as the X-factor method. Design/methodology/approach: The X-factor method was compared with the technique deferred-correction (DC) for the calculations of a two-dimensional cavity with absorting-emiting-scatteting gray media using the discrete ordinates method. Four parameters were considered to evaluate: the absorption coefficient, the emissivity of boundary surface, the scattering albedo and under-relaxation factor. Findings: The results showed the central processing unit (CPU) time of X-factor method was lower than DC. The reductions of CPU time with the X-factor method were observed from 0.6 to 75.4%. Originality/value: The superiority of the X-factor method over DC was showed with the reduction of CPU time of the numerical solution of RTE for evaluated cases.
KW - Deferred-correction
KW - High-resolution TVD schemes
KW - Radiative transfer equation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078890385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/EC-05-2019-0210
DO - 10.1108/EC-05-2019-0210
M3 - Artículo
SN - 0264-4401
VL - 37
SP - 1823
EP - 1847
JO - Engineering Computations (Swansea, Wales)
JF - Engineering Computations (Swansea, Wales)
IS - 5
ER -