Actitudes de los jueces respecto a los sistemas alternativos de justicia juvenil en Hermosillo, Sonora

Translated title of the contribution: Attitudes of judges regarding alternative measures in juvenile justice systems in Hermosillo, Sonora

María Fernanda Mandujano Jaquez, Martha Frías Armenta*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose of this study was to examine attitudes of judges or lawyers in court in relation to acceptance of alternative measures in juvenile justice systems. Sample consisted of 50 law professionals working in courts. The instrument measured judges' attitudes, acceptance of alternative measures, and the social norm. For the analysis of data a structural equations model was specified. Results show that attitudes had a direct effect on acceptance of alternative measures, whereas the social norm affected attitudes; the explained variance was 22%. Results show importance of the psychological variables in the prediction of decision-making of judges and other law professionals of the courts.

Translated title of the contributionAttitudes of judges regarding alternative measures in juvenile justice systems in Hermosillo, Sonora
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)227-234
Number of pages8
JournalRevista Mexicana de Psicologia
Volume28
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Attitudes of judges regarding alternative measures in juvenile justice systems in Hermosillo, Sonora'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this