TY - JOUR
T1 - DNA quantification via nanodrop spectrophotometer
T2 - estimation of method uncertainty using DNA from standard reference materials, sprague dawley rats, and humans
AU - García-Alegría, Alejandro Monserrat
AU - Anduro-Corona, Iván
AU - Pérez-Martínez, Cinthia Jhovanna
AU - Quizán-Plata, Trinidad
AU - Armenta Villegas, Lorena
AU - Rascón-Durán, María Lucila
AU - Astiazaran-Garcia, Humberto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 ACG Publications. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Although the uncertainty calculation proposed by ISO was initially applied to physical quantities, it now also applies to chemical measurements. Therefore, uncertainty estimation contributes to the reliability of the results obtained in analytical chemical measurements, among other parameters. This work seeks to estimate the uncertainty of the analytical method for DNA quantification through a Nanodrop spectrophotometer, using DNA from certified reference materials (NIST 2372), Sprague Dawley rats, and humans. For these purposes, the sources of uncertainty were established and evaluated. Some of these sources are concentration uncertainty from the calibration curves, volumetric materials, dilution factors, analytical balance, repeatability, and reproducibility, as well as DNA concentrations used. The results obtained indicate that the expanded uncertainty was 1.189, 1.360, and 1.944 ng/μL of DNA for the reference material (NIST 2372), Sprague Dawley rats, and humans, thus representing 2.08%, 2.34%, and 2.12%, respectively, for the DNA concentrations from each source (57.0, 57.9, and 91.5 ng/μL DNA, respectively). The uncertainty source that contributes most to these calculations is the dilution factor uncertainty, although it should be noted that the dilution factor uncertainty also considers the volumetric material uncertainty, as well as the fact that five dilutions were used for the calibration curves. Hence, these results may be overestimated.
AB - Although the uncertainty calculation proposed by ISO was initially applied to physical quantities, it now also applies to chemical measurements. Therefore, uncertainty estimation contributes to the reliability of the results obtained in analytical chemical measurements, among other parameters. This work seeks to estimate the uncertainty of the analytical method for DNA quantification through a Nanodrop spectrophotometer, using DNA from certified reference materials (NIST 2372), Sprague Dawley rats, and humans. For these purposes, the sources of uncertainty were established and evaluated. Some of these sources are concentration uncertainty from the calibration curves, volumetric materials, dilution factors, analytical balance, repeatability, and reproducibility, as well as DNA concentrations used. The results obtained indicate that the expanded uncertainty was 1.189, 1.360, and 1.944 ng/μL of DNA for the reference material (NIST 2372), Sprague Dawley rats, and humans, thus representing 2.08%, 2.34%, and 2.12%, respectively, for the DNA concentrations from each source (57.0, 57.9, and 91.5 ng/μL DNA, respectively). The uncertainty source that contributes most to these calculations is the dilution factor uncertainty, although it should be noted that the dilution factor uncertainty also considers the volumetric material uncertainty, as well as the fact that five dilutions were used for the calibration curves. Hence, these results may be overestimated.
KW - DNA
KW - nanodrop spectrophotometer
KW - uncertainty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165871654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.25135/jcm.83.2301.2676
DO - 10.25135/jcm.83.2301.2676
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85165871654
SN - 1307-6183
VL - 17
SP - 25
EP - 41
JO - Journal of Chemical Metrology
JF - Journal of Chemical Metrology
IS - January-June
ER -