Scintillometer intercomparison study - Continued

J. Kleissl; C. J. Watts; J. C. Rodriguez; S. Naif; E. R. Vivoni

doi:10.1007/s10546-009-9352-z

Scintillometer intercomparison study - Continued

J. Kleissl, C. J. Watts, J. C. Rodriguez, S. Naif, E. R. Vivoni

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

An earlier study by one of the authors reported significant differences of up to 21% in linear regression slopes between six Kipp & Zonen large-aperture scintillometers. In this note, the consistency of this increasingly popular instrument for measuring sensible heat fluxes at the km scale was quantified by comparing measurements from four Scintec boundary-layer scintillometers and one large-aperture scintillometer over nearly identical transects. The Kipp & Zonen instrument's sensible heat fluxes were more than 20% larger than those from the Scintec instruments, while the difference in regression slopes amongst the Scintec instruments was 3% or less.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	437-443
Number of pages	7
Journal	Boundary-Layer Meteorology
Volume	130
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9352-z
State	Published - 2009

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgements This study was sponsored by UC-MEXUS grant CN-08-223 and NSF IRES program (OISE 0553852). The K&Z LAS and the two Scintec BLS450 were provided by the Mexican National Water Commission through their regional office in Hermosillo, Sonora.

Keywords

Instrument intercomparison
Large-aperture scintillometer
Sensible heat flux

Access to Document

10.1007/s10546-009-9352-z

Cite this

@article{59aab5131a514038809054c279dbbb48,

title = "Scintillometer intercomparison study - Continued",

abstract = "An earlier study by one of the authors reported significant differences of up to 21% in linear regression slopes between six Kipp & Zonen large-aperture scintillometers. In this note, the consistency of this increasingly popular instrument for measuring sensible heat fluxes at the km scale was quantified by comparing measurements from four Scintec boundary-layer scintillometers and one large-aperture scintillometer over nearly identical transects. The Kipp & Zonen instrument's sensible heat fluxes were more than 20% larger than those from the Scintec instruments, while the difference in regression slopes amongst the Scintec instruments was 3% or less.",

keywords = "Instrument intercomparison, Large-aperture scintillometer, Sensible heat flux",

author = "J. Kleissl and Watts, {C. J.} and Rodriguez, {J. C.} and S. Naif and Vivoni, {E. R.}",

note = "Funding Information: Acknowledgements This study was sponsored by UC-MEXUS grant CN-08-223 and NSF IRES program (OISE 0553852). The K&Z LAS and the two Scintec BLS450 were provided by the Mexican National Water Commission through their regional office in Hermosillo, Sonora.",

year = "2009",

doi = "10.1007/s10546-009-9352-z",

language = "Ingl{\'e}s",

volume = "130",

pages = "437--443",

journal = "Boundary-Layer Meteorology",

issn = "0006-8314",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scintillometer intercomparison study - Continued

AU - Kleissl, J.

AU - Watts, C. J.

AU - Rodriguez, J. C.

AU - Naif, S.

AU - Vivoni, E. R.

N1 - Funding Information: Acknowledgements This study was sponsored by UC-MEXUS grant CN-08-223 and NSF IRES program (OISE 0553852). The K&Z LAS and the two Scintec BLS450 were provided by the Mexican National Water Commission through their regional office in Hermosillo, Sonora.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - An earlier study by one of the authors reported significant differences of up to 21% in linear regression slopes between six Kipp & Zonen large-aperture scintillometers. In this note, the consistency of this increasingly popular instrument for measuring sensible heat fluxes at the km scale was quantified by comparing measurements from four Scintec boundary-layer scintillometers and one large-aperture scintillometer over nearly identical transects. The Kipp & Zonen instrument's sensible heat fluxes were more than 20% larger than those from the Scintec instruments, while the difference in regression slopes amongst the Scintec instruments was 3% or less.

AB - An earlier study by one of the authors reported significant differences of up to 21% in linear regression slopes between six Kipp & Zonen large-aperture scintillometers. In this note, the consistency of this increasingly popular instrument for measuring sensible heat fluxes at the km scale was quantified by comparing measurements from four Scintec boundary-layer scintillometers and one large-aperture scintillometer over nearly identical transects. The Kipp & Zonen instrument's sensible heat fluxes were more than 20% larger than those from the Scintec instruments, while the difference in regression slopes amongst the Scintec instruments was 3% or less.

KW - Instrument intercomparison

KW - Large-aperture scintillometer

KW - Sensible heat flux

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60649118642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10546-009-9352-z

DO - 10.1007/s10546-009-9352-z

M3 - Artículo

SN - 0006-8314

VL - 130

SP - 437

EP - 443

JO - Boundary-Layer Meteorology

JF - Boundary-Layer Meteorology

IS - 3

ER -

Scintillometer intercomparison study - Continued

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this