TY - JOUR
T1 - Electronic conductivity of pyrrole and aniline thin films polymerized by plasma
AU - Morales, J.
AU - Olayo, M. G.
AU - Cruz, G. J.
AU - Castillo-Ortega, M. M.
AU - Olayo, R.
PY - 2000/12/15
Y1 - 2000/12/15
N2 - In this article, we present a study of the influence of temperature and humidity on the electric conductivity of polyaniline and polypyrrole thin films doped with iodine and synthesized by plasma (PAn/I and PPy/I, respectively). The polymers presented the characteristic ohmic conduction mechanism via electrons; however, the conductivity was much lower than that presented by the polymers obtained by traditional chemical oxidation. We submitted the polymers to heating-cooling cycles to study the temperature dependence of the conductivity. During the heating stage of the cycles, the electric conductivity of PPy/I showed a strong dependence on the humidity content. However, during the cooling step, the plots of conductivity, as a function of the inverse temperature of PPy/I and PAn/I, showed typical Arrhenius behavior. The activation energy of PPy/I had an average value of 1.1 ± 0.1 eV and was independent of the reaction time, whereas PAn/I presented a more complex behavior with activation energies that depended on the reaction time and the regional crystallinity induced in the heating step of the cycles. All the activation energies were below 2 eV, which places them in the semiconductor regime.
AB - In this article, we present a study of the influence of temperature and humidity on the electric conductivity of polyaniline and polypyrrole thin films doped with iodine and synthesized by plasma (PAn/I and PPy/I, respectively). The polymers presented the characteristic ohmic conduction mechanism via electrons; however, the conductivity was much lower than that presented by the polymers obtained by traditional chemical oxidation. We submitted the polymers to heating-cooling cycles to study the temperature dependence of the conductivity. During the heating stage of the cycles, the electric conductivity of PPy/I showed a strong dependence on the humidity content. However, during the cooling step, the plots of conductivity, as a function of the inverse temperature of PPy/I and PAn/I, showed typical Arrhenius behavior. The activation energy of PPy/I had an average value of 1.1 ± 0.1 eV and was independent of the reaction time, whereas PAn/I presented a more complex behavior with activation energies that depended on the reaction time and the regional crystallinity induced in the heating step of the cycles. All the activation energies were below 2 eV, which places them in the semiconductor regime.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034512805&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/1099-0488(20001215)38:24<3247::AID-POLB60>3.0.CO;2-U
DO - 10.1002/1099-0488(20001215)38:24<3247::AID-POLB60>3.0.CO;2-U
M3 - Artículo
SN - 0887-6266
VL - 38
SP - 3247
EP - 3255
JO - Journal of Polymer Science, Part B: Polymer Physics
JF - Journal of Polymer Science, Part B: Polymer Physics
IS - 24
ER -